AP TEAM Term Paper Project:
Outline Format
II. Shaping
forces of your person’s argument(s) (about 2 ½ pages)
What shaped your person and his/her essential argument(s)
and action(s) relevant to his/her primary work?
·
Focus on proving how
various forces helped to create your unique person. Prove the influences behind the argument(s)
in the work you’ve chosen
·
Insert a quote or image from a primary source that
showcases the shaping forces of the argument(s) (make sure to analyze this
quote or image later in this movement)
A. PERSONAL
FACTORS: upbringing, family life, education, most influential people and
events,
B. SOCIETAL
FACTORS: politics, society, technology, religion, culture, economy, conflicts,
the arts, etc.
C. SOCIETAL
FACTORS: politics, society, technology, religion, culture, economy, conflicts,
the arts, etc.
(D.
SOCIETAL FACTORS:
politics, society, technology, religion, culture, economy, conflicts, the arts,
etc.)*
III. Predominant
Argument(s) and Rhetorical/Style Analysis (about ½ page of an excerpt and
about 2 ½ pages of analysis)
Insert an essential excerpt from the person’s work (then you will analyze
this passage in this movement)
·
What are his/her
essential argument(s) found in the passage (a thorough discussion of the
literary and/or social
concerns/philosophies)?
of
this writer and how his/her works reflect these views.)?
·
What are the
rhetorical strategies employed by your person in the passage?
Choose only those that apply: structure of the passage,
characterization, diction, important and relevant syntactic features,
figurative language, sound devices, point of view, mood, use of
pathos, etc.
·
Categorize this
movement into the following 3 or 4 subtopics. Choose one of the following formats to
best fit your needs for this movement:*
Sample Format #1 Sample Format #2 Sample Format #3
Rhetorical Strategy Author’s argument(s) Custom Option?
A. Argument(s) A. Arguments A. Argument(s)
Overview/intro. Overview/intro. Overview/intro.
B. Rhetorical strategy B. Argument #1 B.
1. Rhetorical strategy 1.
2. Rhetorical strategy 2.
C. Rhetorical strategy C. Argument #2 C.
1. Rhetorical strategy 1.
2. Rhetorical strategy 2.
(D. Rhetorical strategy?) (D. Argument #3) D.
1. Rhetorical strategy 1.
2. Rhetorical strategy 2.
IV. Discussion
of literary criticism on the author’s work and explanation of author’s overall
impact on
American society (about 2 ½ pages)
·
Insert a quote or image from a
primary source that validates your claim of the legacies that his/her work and
argument(s) have had or will have on American society (analyze
this quote or image later in this movement)
What were, are, or are likely to be the legacies and
literary contributions of his/her work on American society?
·
Consider: research on
opinions of the author’s work and contributions, a logical context/organization
to present these published criticisms, contribution to the
literature/politics/popular culture of his/her country, contribution to history
of literature in general, universality of author’s themes, and aesthetic value
(popular appeal) of author’s work.
·
Blend in opinions from
expert historians or literary critics where they will be particularly
effective. Your careful handling of
these various criticisms will have a serious impact on the cohesiveness of your
paper.
A.
Legacy #1 (including
evidence/support from historical and/or literary experts)
B.
Legacy #2 (including
evidence/support from historical and/or literary experts)
C.
Legacy #3 (including
evidence/support from historical and/or literary experts)
(D.
Legacy #4 (including
evidence/support from historical and/or literary experts))*
V. Conclusion
(about ½ page)
·
10+ sources: one major
work by the author or artist PLUS 7 to 9 academic/hard sources
(totaling at least10). Other sources
like web sites may count as additional sources.*
·
Include all sources
cited and those read or consulted during your research
that were not included in the Works Cited page. Write a one-sentence description of each
source.
* See
the teachers if you have questions on these four points. Some flexibility and student discretion is to
be expected.